data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74633/7463328ebf50cb362a07ec3d0d8b8307b3591cdf" alt=""_McGINNIS%5B2%5D.jpg)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2146e/2146eab023a475dedd6a1b7f690583dffb9d5c9b" alt=""
Father Waldron married James and Mary Ellen in 1883. There are indications but no documentation as yet that he also Baptized the first Child Maggie in 1884.
After the death of John Sr. in 1861, at a relatively young age of 50, it is obvious the family John left behind in Chatham worked closely as a family unit to provide for themselves after the loss of the main provider. This closeness is very well what explains why and how the family maintained the family unit over the years from New Brunswick through Chicago and on to Seattle. Sarah married Patrick Fitzpatrick in Chatham in 1884 and based on the birth of her first two children, John and Marguerite (also sometimes found as Margaret) somewhere in New York State in 1886 and 1888, shows that the overall family was temporarily separated.
Patrick was 16 years old when his father died and he may have been forced by financial circumstances to begin work at this young age in order to help support the family. This path obviously led him into a Carpentry trade and by the time he left Chatham sometime after the 1871 census at the age of 23 he very well may have seen that the future need for carpenters in New Brunswick was diminishing quickly. Shipbuilding was beginning to phase out and he was young and as the young quite often are, rather adventurous. If he had been required to begin working around the time of his father’s death then by the time he left some seven to ten years later he would have had time to acquire a fair level of carpentry skills.
Just when Patrick emigrated is very difficult to answer. There are conflicting dates. His 1900 census entry states he left Canada in 1875. That is somewhat confirmed since he is listed in the McGinnis household, living with his Stepmother and her children in the 1871 Chatham, New Brunswick census. Personally I believe he left home in the last part of 1871.
The conflicting date stems from his short 1908 election biography as published in the Seattle Post Intelligencer in November of 1908. He relates that he had spent 14 years in Chicago prior to coming to Seattle in 1882 to establish himself in the contracting business. This would have placed him in Chicago in 1868. There is also some vague proof of that for one Patrick McGinnis can be found in the Chicago 1870 census working as a laborer. If this is the case he would have been living in the city the year Mrs. O’Leary’s cow kicked over the lantern that set the city on fire. If this is our Patrick it cannot be verified currently since this fact would mean he was in two places in 1871, both Chatham and Chicago. Very, very unlikely. The 1882 date in the newspaper article is highly suspect and for my purposes he did not arrive in Chicago before 1871.
The family separation, when ever it began, though temporary, was not total separation for the family core remained in Chatham and Sarah was beginning her family some where in New York State. Chicago would have given Patrick opportunity to improve his skills and observe the workings of the construction trades in a large setting. His insight of the opportunities the city had to offer certainly influenced his younger brothers, James, Arthur and Hugh to eventually follow him there and certainly with the aid of their older brother, they also became involved in the construction trades and commenced their paths in life.
According to Patrick’s political biography he arrived in Seattle in 1882, after living in Chicago for 14 years. That would mean he arrived in Chicago in 1868 at the age of 23. This was but three years following the end of our Civil War. He would have been living in the city at the time Mrs. O’Leary’s cow supposedly kicked over the lantern in October of 1871 resulting in that city’s famous fire. Immediately following the fire would have placed him in the right time and place for possible employment as a young man
A possible trace of young Patrick does tend to coincide with the 1868 arrival in Chicago and that is the following entry in a Chicago city directory of 1870 found at http://www.chicagoancestors.org/downloads/1870m.pdf
Is this our Patrick? Very possible but unlikely after fitting all the facts together. The person is working as a laborer. What is more interesting is that the address is on Clark Street where his younger brother James was living after his marriage in 1883. There was something about that neighborhood and the eventual marriage of James and Mary Ellen that suggests Patrick was established there at one point and when James arrived in the city he may have shared Patrick’s quarters. As mentioned elsewhere, this is the very neighborhood that Mary Ellen’s older brother, Patrick Donahue owned a grocery store.
Another possible trace of Patrick McGinnis in Chicago is also from a Chicago city directory of 1880, two years before striking out for Seattle. This particular Patrick McGinnis is a partner in the business of “Boyle and McGinnis” located at 927 N. Halstad. All these directories can be found at http://www.chicagoancestors.org/#tab-tools. Probably not our Patrick for the firm is listed in the business section as “Ice Dealers” but that remains to be seen.
If his political bio from the Seattle newspapers of 1908 is correct, then he was in Chicago from 1868 to 1882. His 1900 Seattle census entry gives the emigration year as 1875, the 1900 census provides no date, the 1920 census states 1885. Solid evidence for dates just does not exist.
Regardless, Patrick eventually came to Seattle and probably immediately began his contracting business, using the business skills he must have learned during those 14 years in Chicago. It is rather frustrating not to find the man after 1871 in any record until 1900. We only know that he was in Chicago for fourteen years prior to heading west. Rail travel out of Chicago to the west coast during much of this time was really only available to San Francisco along the first Transcontinental Railroad although there were many projects in various stages of construction, some partially completed, attempting to reach the Northwest. All in all it was not a simple task to finally find your way to Seattle from Chicago until late in the 1880’s. But the man definitely made the journey and once again the “Pied Piper” eventually beckoned, this time from the west coast.
The question of when and where Patrick decided to change the spelling of his surname remains unresolved for now. Such an over worn statement in researching a families past but sadly it states the truth of the matter. I am confident that eventually the time will be established. The reason is also conjecture but due to his ethnicity it may have been the prudent thing to do for a young man attempting to establish himself in the business community.
The immigrant Irish bore an ethnic prejudicial stigma for many years just as any new immigrant group unfortunately will somehow have to endure. Its human nature and it will always exist in my opinion. The Italian’s in our history endured it as did the Chinese and the list goes on. Reading bits of history of our countries evolvement reveals that the Irish beginning in the early 1800’s and through much of the rest of the century at different times and in various places were treated as badly as the free Negro of the North. There was rampant discrimination for many years for both groups. The Irish and the free blacks actually competed for many of the same employment opportunities. The citizens of the day seemed to associate the traits of one group with the traits of the other. Chicago and Boston are a curiosity though for the early Irish of those cities really succeeded, certainly politically, but it took time and hard work for that to happen.
In the late 1800’s the conditions that the McGinnis clan faced in America may still have included a high level of prejudice. This was not the case in Eastern Canada however so it was a very new experience for all of them if it existed. The degree of the stigma remains questionable but still quite possible that it was present in their every day lives. The surname spelled as McInnis is a common Scotch variant spelling of McGinnis. McInnes is another variant as well and there are many more. Which is proper and correct I suppose might just depend on where one was located. But McInnis is and was accepted as a Scottish or an English name. Perhaps Patrick decided that for business purposes, in order to avoid possible stumbling blocks in his business dealings, in a new location and not knowing what his Irish roots might burden him with, that he would adapt the more English version when he began his new life in Seattle. He was out to find a new beginning and he did succeed to some degree and probably while using a different surname spelling.
Patrick left a mark on Seattle, a minor one perhaps, but enough so that he does appear at least twice in the local newspapers. Sadly one of those was his obituary. Rather obscure mentions perhaps but they add small facts that aid in expanding the overall story.
The following is copied from his political biography from the Seattle Post Intelligencer of November 1st, 1908. He was running for a seat in State House of Representatives for Seattle’s 43rd District, always an important legislative district in Seattle politics, then and now. The district today covers the central core of the city roughly from Lake Union east to Lake Washington and from the University District south to the Pioneer Square area. Two days later Patrick was elected, placing second in the polling which enabled him to take a seat in Olympia the following January 11th, 1909.
"P. McInnis, candidate from the Forty-third district, is a Canadian by birth and came to the United States when a young man. Chicago was his first home city in this country, and he lived there for fourteen years, following his trade of carpenter.
In 1882 Mr. McInnis arrived in Seattle and his since lived continuously in this city. The first few years were spent at the bench as carpenter, but when the city began to grow, Mr. McInnis shared in the general prosperity. He laid aside apron and tools and became a contractor.
Far sighted enough to foresee the future of Seattle when it was but a village of 5,000, Mr. McInnis invested his savings in Seattle real estate, and today he owns much valuable property.
As a large taxpayer he is opposed to extravagance in public affairs and will support all measures directed towards an economical administration of the business of the state."
Tuesday, February 9, 2009
The vote tally from the 1908 Election for the 43rd district is as follows:
Ole Hanson 1653
P. McInnis 1577
Harry T. Traynor 389
Frank B. Wilson
J. Willon 11
J. Solar 11
Homer Bull 5
O. St. Stone 1
Fred St. Pettys 1
I also checked the 1906 and 1910 election results but Mr. McInnis apparently didn't run in either of those years.If you have any other questions please feel free to contact us again.
Phil Stairs, Research Assistant
Puget Sound Regional Archives3000 Landerholm Circle S.E.,
MS-N100Bellevue, WA 98007-6484
(425) 564-3940
My First Views of the Bois'darc Trees
The Trees Have an Almost Helter-Skelter Branch Pattern
Searching the web to see what a Bodoc tree might look like took me to a knowledgeable web site, http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/showimage/98151
The following picture was taken from that web page and it and others on the site confirms that I had found a property line for the Jones farm. The newspaper clipping implied that all the hedges had been removed but obviously the article may have been referring to what might have been the property line along the old route into Harrison past the front or northern edge of the original property.
----- Original Message -----
From: ALLISON JONES
To: Kathleen@Boone County Library
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: ATTENTION KATHLEEN, GENEALOGY ROOM
Thank you again Kathleen,
I have been able to locate the property on a good topographical map I have of the area. Based on some logic and assumptions I can almost draw the property line based on the fact that the farm covered 120 acres. The map, USGS Batavia, Ark, is a 1967 edition and it reflects an outbuilding on the property that you have described for me. In all likelihood this is the barn as described by Mrs. Moore. This is far more than I had known previously, although I still hold out hope to find the legal description someday.
Your attention to my request has been most kind. I also thank LaMayne Moore once again. Please do keep me in mind if anything else might surface regarding my interest.
Have a wonderful day,
Allison Jones
Richmond Hill, Georgia
----- Original Message -----
From: Kathleen@Boone County Library
To: ALLISON JONES
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: ATTENTION KATHLEEN, GENEALOGY ROOM
Good afternoon, Allison,
I have heard from Mrs. Moore again today and she has located the property from the map that we found. She said that from Rock Springs Rd. you should turn right on Crow Lane and it all property to south along hedge row which is the original land. At this time it is airport property. The house has been gone many years, but the barn fell down about 3 years ago.
Maybe you can make another trip up here and see it sometime.
Have a good afternoon. Kathleen